Some structural engineers may avoid including waterproofing and damp treatment in their specifications or BOQ (Bill of Quantities) for several reasons:-
1. Lack of expertise:-
They may not have sufficient knowledge or experience in waterproofing and damp treatment, making them uncomfortable including it in their specifications.
2. Focus on structural integrity:-
Structural engineers may prioritize the building’s structural integrity and overlook the importance of waterproofing and damp treatment.
3. Assuming it’s someone else’s responsibility:-
They might assume that architects, builders, or other professionals will handle waterproofing and damp treatment, so they don’t include it in their specifications.
4. Cost concerns:-
Including waterproofing and damp treatment may increase the project’s cost, which could be a concern for engineers working on budget-sensitive projects.
5. Overlooking long-term consequences:-
Engineers may focus on short-term goals and neglect the long-term consequences of neglecting waterproofing and damp treatment.
6. Lack of understanding of local conditions:-
Engineers may not be familiar with local weather patterns, soil conditions, or other factors that require specialized waterproofing and damp treatment.
7. Prioritizing aesthetics over functionality:-
In some cases, engineers might prioritize the building’s appearance over its functionality and durability.
It’s essential to educate structural engineers about the importance of waterproofing and damp treatment and encourage them to include these critical components in their specifications and BOQ to ensure the building’s longevity and structural integrity.
